subscribe
My PhotoBlog with Less Words and More Photos
Call Me 818 570-0301

Posts Tagged ‘diafine’

Rollie Pan 25 and Diafine (B&W)

While in a photo store I decided to try a film unfamiliar to me Rollie Pan 25. Not much information is published regarding this made in Germany film in a strange container. I loaded my M6 and took it out and shot the entire roll in a day. I also just got the Voigtlander Ultron 28mm f/2 lens and needed to find out how it shoots. I burned through the roll quite fast within 24 hours in order to understand for my self for both reasons the film and the lens.
28mm VC 25iso Rollei Pan005

28mm VC 25iso Rollei Pan003

Decided that Diafine will be the developer soup for this roll as I could not find anyone else who developed it using Diafine. I was a bit nervous when developing it and thought it would ruin the film. Diafine is the best and the only developer I have tried. I read about it on Figital Revolution site and Stephen has detail instructions on using Diafine which are simply to follow the instructions on the box. He also has his home made soup from coffee (check it out).

28mm VC 25iso Rollei Pan001

Just after finishing shooting my first roll of Rollie 25 I saw a great article by Max Marinucci called Low Speed Film, Fast Lenses. Max inspired me by his example of photography on Filckr.

Driver

Most of the photos came out fantastic and I love this film as well as the lens. I must admit once a photo is nailed – you can see it!

Passenger

I did some experimentation on how to scan these on my Epson V700 and tried scanning as a positive film, negative film color, negative film b&w. In the end there is quite a small difference between these settings. Some of my photos were just a bit under exposed. This has happened to me before and I think part of the issue is related to the fact that Leica metering is in the middle of the viewfinder and the size is dependent on which lens is used. It can be tricky.

this image is from Joe Chan site which contains several manuals

Here are a few shots/outtakes which I thought were underexposed via operator error. It is nice to under expose for effects, but that is intentional…. these are not.